1.7 Ocial Accountability and Ethics
As public ocials, registers of deeds are accountable to the people of North
Carolina for executing their duties faithfully and honestly. It is a Class 1
misdemeanor for a register to fail “to perform any of the duties imposed
or authorized by law,” and the potential penalties include removal from
oce.
119
It is also a Class 1 misdemeanor for a register to “fail, neglect or
refuse to make, le, or publish any report, statement or other paper, or to
deliver to his successor all books and other property belonging to his oce,
or to pay over or deliver to the proper person all moneys which come into
his hands by virtue or color of his oce.”
120
Registers are subject to other restrictions and prohibitions in their con-
duct that apply to public ocials generally. e N.C. Constitution pro-
vides that funds raised through taxation may be used “for public purposes
only.”
121
e N.C. Supreme Court instructed that “for a use to be public
its benets must be in common and not for particular persons, interests,
or estates; the ultimate net gain or advantage must be the public’s as con-
tradistinguished from that of an individual or private entity.”
122
In most
cases there is no question that a proposed purpose, such as personnel costs
and costs of operations, is public. But in a modern environment, a wide
variety of less obviously public expenses are incurred in connection with
such things as educational programs and consultation with other ocials
and policy makers. Expenses for participation in educational programs
and associational activities related to the registers’ oces are appropriate
for registers and their employees. is includes participation in the North
Carolina Register of Deeds Association, which is described in Section 1.10
below. Although each register’s participation and support of individual ini-
tiatives may vary, the law recognizes that each county has an appropriate
role in an association of this nature.
123
For instance, each county benets
from its register’s participation in statewide policy initiatives. Expenses
119. G.S. 14-230, -231, -241.
120. G.S. 161-27; G.S. 14-231.
121. N.C. Const. art. V, § 2(1).
122. Martin v. N.C. Hous. Corp., 277 N.C. 29, 43, 175 S.E.2d 665, 673 (1970).
123. Horne v. Chan, 62 N.C. App. 95, 302 S.E.2d 281 (the N.C. Court of Appeals
upheld the appropriateness of county and city expenditures for a reception for state
and local ocials, noting that local ocials have a duty to represent their constituents
in inuencing state policy), a ’d 309 N.C. 813, 309 S.E.2d 239 (1983).
32 | North Carolina Guidebook for Registers of Deeds