Page 3 of 6
Coverage Policy Number:
0152
independent of reduction technique is delayed wound healing. Late complications can include, but are not
limited to, seroma, scars and pseudoptosis (McGrath and Pomerantz, 2012; Nahai, et al., 2008; Greydanus, et
al., 2006).
The Schnur Sliding Scale is an evaluation tool that may be used to determine the appropriate amount of tissue
to be removed compared to a patient’s total body surface area (BSA). This can be instrumental in determining if
breast reduction is being planned for a purely cosmetic reason or as a medically necessary procedure. In a
survey of plastic surgeons, Schnur et al. (1991) concluded that women whose removed breast weight was less
than the 5th percentile sought the procedure for cosmetic reasons and all women whose breast weight was
greater than the 22nd percentile sought the procedure for medical reasons. A calculation for BSA is: BSA (in m
2
)
= [height (cm)]
0.718
X [weight (kilograms [kg])]
0.427
X .007449.
Breast tissue regrowth following initial breast reduction in adolescence has been reported (Greydanus, et al.,
2006). The growth of the female breast is generally described by five stages referred to as Tanner stages or
sexually maturity rating (SMR) stages. A number of clinical correlations are noted with the SMR stages,
including the timing of breast reduction at stage V (i.e., mature stage) (DeSilva, et al., 2006). In a review of
elective plastic surgical procedures in adolescence, McGrath and Schooler (2004) stated “Breast development
is variable but usually plateaus at 15–16 years of age. Reduction mammoplasty is postponed until breast
maturity is reached. Occasionally, surgery is considered earlier when severe symptoms are encountered; there
is a risk of recurrent hypertrophy, however.” In general, breast maturity should have been reached prior to
considering breast reduction surgery.
Literature Review
Controlled clinical studies assessing the effectiveness of surgical removal of modest amounts of breast tissue in
reducing neck, shoulder, and back pain and related disabilities in women are lacking. Despite the lack of
controlled studies, reduction mammoplasty has become the standard of care for a subset of individuals with
symptomatic macromastia. Evidence suggests that calculating breast reduction in correlation to each patient’s
body weight and height can have an effect on reducing preoperative signs and persistent physical conditions.
(Cunningham, et al., 2005; Blomqvist, et al., 2004; Souto, et al., 2003; Collins, et al., 2002; Ayhan, et al., 2002;
Bruhlmann, et al., 1998).
Chadbourne et al. (2001) conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 studies of 4173 patients to
determine whether reduction mammoplasty improves measurable outcomes in women with breast hypertrophy.
Experimental and observational studies were included; no randomized controlled trials were found. Outcomes
assessed were postoperative physical signs and symptoms such as shoulder pain, shoulder (bra strap)
grooving, and quality-of-life domains, such as physical and psychological functioning, and were expressed
primarily as risk differences. The mean body mass index of the patients was 27.5 kg/m
2
in the observational
studies and 29.6 kg/m
2
in the experimental studies. The average tissue mass removed per breast was
approximately 1400 grams. The authors concluded that reduction mammoplasty was associated with a
statistically significant improvement in physical signs and symptoms involving shoulder pain, shoulder grooving,
upper/lower back pain, neck pain, intertrigo, breast pain, headache, and pain/numbness in the hands. The
quality-of-life parameter of physical functioning was also statistically significant, while psychological functioning
was not significant. The evidence suggests that women undergoing reduction mammoplasty for breast
hypertrophy have significant postoperative improvement in preoperative signs and symptoms, quality of life, or
both.
Breast Reduction by Liposuction
Suction lipectomy or ultrasonically-assisted suction lipectomy (liposuction) as a sole procedure has been
introduced as an alternative method in reducing breast size. The effectiveness of liposuction, in terms of
removing glandular breast tissue, rather than fatty tissue in the breast, remains to be demonstrated. Evidence
supporting the effects of this approach on patient outcomes has been limited to case series and there are
minimal long-term data comparing this technique to the standard surgical approach (Maskovitz, et al., 2007;
ECRI, 2014; Sadove, et al., 2005).
Professional Societies/Organizations
American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS): The 2011 update to the 2002 ASPS policy statement,
insurance coverage criteria for third-party payors for reduction mammaplasty, recommends that justification for
reduction mammaplasty should be based on the probability of relieving the clinical signs and symptoms of